|
Review: Jet or Turboprop? Part III
Back To Page 3
Both the ATR and ERJ have excellent
night lighting although once again I prefer the bright, crisp
look of the ERJ over the dimly lit (though more realistic
looking) ATR.
For fans of flying from the virtual
cockpit (VC) the ATR has one of the crispest and detailed
VCs Ive seen. Even the night lighting in the VC is very
well done (traditionally a weak area for most add-ons) and
the resolution of the gauges and text is high enough that
flipping switches and working systems isnt very difficult.
The ERJ fares a little worse in the area of VC resolution
in both daylight and night modes of operation. The panels
are a bit blurry and finding the correct buttons and switches
would require a memorization of what is where since you cant
really read the lettering.
 |
 |
The external 3D models for both aircraft
are top notch; both are beautiful aircraft to behold and the
artists did a great job of bringing these machines to life
in FS2004. I have only one gripe with the ERJ; when the aircraft
is on the ground there is an ever so slight gap between the
wheels and the pavement, giving the illusion that the aircraft
is hovering a few inches off the ground. Not a big deal, but
it is noticeable. The ATR has several additional features
such as a moving flight attendant jump seat and a door to
the lav that opens and closes. Gimmicky things that I dont
feel add anything, but Im sure some people love features
like this.
Sounds are extremely good for both
aircraft. Warning bells and whistles, props, jets, starters,
APU, "Bitchin Betty", etc., they are all done
well. Enough said.
Systems modeling is done nicely in
both aircraft although I had the overall impression that the
ATR had more working parts and systems modeled than the ERJ.
The only reason I suspect that is that many of the switches
and functions on the upper panel of the ATR worked while on
the ERJ some switches were non-functioning. That said, a modern
aircraft such as the ERJ is all about automation, so concessions
in switches and knobs may just be a reflection on simplifying
the cockpit.
Finally, I cant stress enough
how much Bryan Yorks FS2Crew adds to the whole Flight
Simulator experience. While it definitely adds a lot to the
ATR, it is my understanding that Bryan has created FS2Crew
add-ons for other aircraft as well, so dont feel pigeonholed
into only trying it out for the ATR. Flying with FS2Crew enabled
is easily as absorbing as flying a combat mission in Falcon
4, a comparison our readers would probably find easy to grasp.
While initially daunting, flying in a crew environment should
rapidly become easier with practice. In any case, if you want
a great representation of what it is like to fly in a professional
crew environment, FS2Crew is the way to go, and pairing it
with the Flight1 ATR is a great combination.
So jet or turboprop? I fly both for
a living and I still havent made up my mind. The King
Air I fly is roomier, noisier, but doesnt stray very
far from home. The Citation is quieter, more powerful, more
cramped and often takes me further away than I really want
to be. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. Catch
me on any given day and Im likely to give you a totally
different answer as to which I prefer more. The same holds
true for the feelThere ERJ 145 and the Flight1 ATR.
Reviewer's System Specs
- Alienware Pentium 4, 3.4GHz
- 2 GB DDR2 SDRAM
- NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT PCI Express
256MB
- CH Flight Yoke and Pro Pedals
Note: For illustrative purposes some
of the images in this 3-part series were cropped or in order
to highlight certain aspects of the software. All images were
captured at 1280 x 1024 with no FSAA and were reduced in size
and quality for bandwidth purposes.
We want your Feedback.
Please let us know what you thought of this article here.
Click
here to go to top of this page.
|