|
Feature
April 24, 2006
From
the June, 2027 Edition of Popular Mechtronics
The
Fastest Thing on Earth
The
Now-Declassified Story of the Easter 2006
Iran Reconnaissance Overflight
by Guest Writer Jim
"Woxof" Hart
Introduction
It's Spring, 2006. It's been three
years since the United States and its coalition allies removed
the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq. But Iraq seems
as far from peace as it can be; worse, some critics maintain,
than it was under Saddam. And one of the reasons is Iran.
The Islamic fundamentalists who have
governed Iran under strict Shia doctrine since the fall of
the Shah in the 1970s see an opportunity in Iraq's post-Saddam
turmoil to achieve covertly what they could not in open warfare
to foster a government sympathetic to, or better yet
closely allied with, the Islamic republic of Iran. They have
funneled weapons, money and men across the countries' common
border to battle the US and the fledgling Iraqi government.
And they have bluntly warned the West: We have nuclear weapons,
and we will not hesitate to use them.
On Tuesday, April 11, Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announces in a press conference that his
country has succeeded for the first time in its quest to achieve
domestic large-scale enrichment of uranium. This prompts US
Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice to declare the next day
that it was time for action on Iran: "This is not
a question of Iran's right to civil nuclear power
This
is a question of,... the world does not believe that Iran
should have the capability and the technology that could lead
to a nuclear weapon."
But experts are split over the question
of whether Iran really does possess that technology. More,
and more timely data is needed. The military intelligence
services are doing all they can to collect the critical snippets
of information that will allow analysts to determine the answer.
Every possible channel of collection is being examined, including
some that are decidedly unconventional, and one that the general
public and aerospace experts alike are certain couldn't possibly
exist.
In the intervening twenty years, all
that was heard were pieces of a rumor, but never the whole
story: Some kind of space-based weapon
Vanished into
thin air
A sound like the sky tearing in half
Meteors don't turn! Well, this one did!
Even after the existence of the F-136
was acknowledged in 2014, many in the aerospace community
had the persistent feeling that there was still a story out
there, waiting patiently to be told. Finally, it can be.
By combining recently declassified
documents with contemporary media accounts and Internet postings,
a picture began to emerge. But what finally brought the story
into focus was an interview with the man who flew the mission,
USAF Brigadier General Horace Killmore (ret). I visited General
Killmore at his home in Cody, Wyoming. The dozens of framed
pictures along one downstairs hallway could easily be a museum
exhibit recounting the early days of the Second Space Age.
The Vehicle
Development of what was to become
the F-136 Orbital Defense Interceptor began in the fall of
1998 under the program codeword Senior Matte. The specification
issued by USAF HQ called for an aerospace plane that seemed
every bit as impossible to build at the time as had the original
A-12 Blackbird back in the mid-50s: An ultra-high speed, low
observable, single-stage-to-orbit spacecraft, with a primary
mission being the interception and destruction of opposition
satellites, weapons and vehicles on or near low Earth orbit.
Secondary missions were to include transport of cargo or personnel
to and from orbiting spacecraft, delivery of guided weapons
in the 2000-lb. weight class anywhere in the world in less
than 120 minutes, and overhead photographic or electronic
reconnaissance at altitudes between about 100K feet and low
Earth orbit.
Lockheed/Martin was selected as the
prime contractor in spring 2000, primarily due to their experience
with previous "black" reconnaissance aircraft and
the covert F-117 and Blackstar programs. While Lockheed retained
propulsion, system integration and overall program responsibility,
Boeing's Phantom Works was chosen as the lead subcontractor
for the spaceframe, and aerodynamic development began under
the codeword Have Garnet. It would be fourteen more
years, and the accumulation of numerous aerospace "firsts"
by the Have Garnet program, before the existence of
the F-136 was revealed to the public.

DECLASSIFIED: The F-136B
in the hangar.
But the vehicle that now hangs in
the USAF Museum, YF-136 03-0714, is a very different one from
today's operational orbital fighters. It was, in fact, little
more than a proof-of-concept platform. "It had the
hull and aerodynamics, but none of the spacegoing equipment,"
recalled Killmore. "Since we didn't have the spacecraft's
reaction control system, our effective ceiling had to be limited
to about 95,000 feet. Above that altitude there weren't enough
air molecules for the control surfaces to be effective. The
production engines were years away from being ready, so we
had installed two highly modified GE F-414s, similar to those
in the F/A-18E, delivering about 25K pounds of thrust dry,
but with an afterburner/scramjet carried over from the Blackstar
program. The flight control computer was modified from the
one used in the F-117, and avionics and environmental systems
were right out of the U-2S."
This wedding of bleeding-edge aerodynamics
and propulsion with off-the-shelf equipment led to some interesting
control compromises for the pilot. "We knew anytime
we operated at high Mach it had to be on autopilot. Things
happened too fast in cruise for a mere human hand-flying to
deal with them quickly and smoothly enough. That had been
proven back in the beginning A-12 days. But the early afterburner/scramjets
we had in the Y model weren't throttleable. They were simply
on-or-off. If left on, they could easily accelerate the ship
past the Mach 4.25 limit we'd set again, for aerodynamic
reasons. But without them, speed would decay over a few minutes
to the low Mach 2 range, at which point the ship would begin
to mush and lose altitude. The only solution was to monitor
speed closely and cycle the scramjets on or off to keep the
vehicle within a narrow range between 3.75 and 4.25 Mach.
Try as we might, we could not program the off-the-shelf autopilot
to perform that function properly, and it would be years before
we got one that behaved. So on top of managing and monitoring
a craft moving three times as fast as a rifle bullet, I also
had to turn the burners on and off manually to keep the speed
in check." Killmore grinned. "Big fun."
This configuration was never intended
for flight beyond the atmosphere. But the availability of
an aerodynamically-conforming in-atmosphere test vehicle would
shorten the development program by years. And it would allow
for some interesting "demonstrations."
Go
To Page 2
Click
here to go to top of this page.
Copyright 2008, SimHQ.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact the webmaster.
|