|
Review
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
by John
Reynolds
Introduction
Following closely behind Intel's dual
core preview in early April, AMD is today announcing their
desktop counterpoint with the Athlon 64 X2 lineup. This new
brand consists of four processors that continue AMD's naming
convention of model numbers based somewhat obliquely on clock
speed and cache sizes, ranging from the Athlon 64 X2 4200+
to the X2 4800+. And
with the announcement of the Athlon 64 X2 series, AMD is ending
the vanilla Athlon 64s, leaving the 4000+ as the company's
last single-core processor for the brand; the FX series, however,
will continue with the FX-57, a 2.8GHz processor due later
this year. AMD has stated that the review sample sent to SimHQ
is a production-ready part, with availability for the X2s
starting this June.
The Athlon 64 X2 4800+, the high-end
of the announced desktop X2 lineup, is a 2.4GHz CPU fabricated
on AMD's 90nm SOI (Silicon on Insulator) process with 128
KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache per core - essentially
two Athlon 64 4000+s in a single chip in terms of clock speed
and cache sizes. Based on the new Toledo core, a Rev-E stepping
for AMD's 1 MB L2 cache CPUs, the X2 processors have a total
transistor count of roughly 233 million for the entire die.
The X2 4600+ is also clocked at 2.4GHz, but offers a reduced
L2 cache of 512 KB. The 4400+ and 4200+ likewise follow this
pattern: both processors are clocked at 2.2GHz, with the higher
model number offering a larger cache (1 MB) per core. These
clock speeds, matching the frequencies of AMD's current single-core
offerings, are a sharp contrast with Intel's 840 processor
and its 600MHz clock rate disparity in comparison to the company's
fastest single-core processor.
Similar to Intel's 840, AMD's dual
core engineering effort consists of joining two separate,
unconnected cores on a single die that share the same access
to system resources. Yet the X2 processors, like their Athlon
64 predecessors, benefit from an on-die memory controller
that has given AMD a significant performance advantage over
Intel parts, which must communicate execution requests across
an external front-side bus to the north bridge chip. In contrast,
the X2's single memory controller, using a 128-bit wide crossbar
switch, works with the System Request Queue (SRQ) in arbitrating
execution requests to the appropriate core. This design should
strongly benefit the Athlon 64 X2s when working with heavily
threaded applications, and may continue giving the X2s the
performance edge over Intel's dual-core parts the single-core
A64s have enjoyed for the past several years. The downside
to this design, however, is that AMD's dual-core processors
will have available the same amount of memory bandwidth as
single-core Athlon 64s, and with a maximum supported memory
speed of DDR400 this leaves the two cores sharing between
them at most only 6.4 GB of bandwidth. While this situation
currently leaves Intel in a better position regarding memory
bandwidth, their solution also suffers from higher latencies
than AMD's.
Compatibility with existing 939 Socket
motherboards is also another strong advantage of the Athlon
64 X2s. For gamers desiring to upgrade from a 939-pin, single-core
Athlon 64 to a dual-core X2 processor, AMD claims that a board
BIOS update is all that is required. The ease of this upgrade
path for current A64 owners could play a key role in market
penetration for the Athlon 64 X2s, at least for this first
generation of dual cores since the pin count of subsequent
parts could change as AMD makes the expected move to DDR2
support. Pricing,
however, could be an issue since AMD lacks the manufacturing
capabilities of the competition, and initial yields on such
large dies as the Athlon 64 X2s might remain poor until processes
mature and new steppings are introduced. The announced dual-core
pricing runs from slightly over $500 for the 4200+ to over
$1,000 for the 4800+, removing the X2 line from the mainstream
and gaming segments of the market.
Test System Setup
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon
64 FX-55
- ASUS A8N SLI Deluxe (nForce4) motherboard
- 1 GB (2x 512 MB) Corsair DDR400
memory
- ATI Radeon X800 XT PCI Express
graphics board (Catalyst 5.4)
- Windows XP Professional (SP2 and
DirectX 9.0c)
The benchmark suite used to evaluate
this test system is listed here.
As standard practice, 32-bit color and trilinear texture filtering
are the default baseline during testing, and anti-aliasing
and anisotropic texture filtering were disabled throughout
all tests, along with ATI's A.I. optimizations. Also, Windows
XP Professional was configured to have Automatic Updates,
System Restore, and all unnecessary startup services disabled.
The licensed version of Fraps 2.5.5 was used to record performance
scores unless otherwise noted. And similar to our performance
preview of the Intel 840, SimHQ decided to compare the Athlon
64 X2 4800+ against AMD's highest clocked single-core processor,
the FX-55 (2.6GHz). Both processors were tested running on
the ASUS A8N SLI Deluxe motherboard.
Go
To Page 2
Click
here to go to top of this page.
Copyright 2008, SimHQ.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact the webmaster.
|