|
Review: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Back
to Page 1
Benchmark Scores
The Comanche
4 benchmarking demo, a somewhat aged DX8 game that
is nevertheless extremely CPU-limited, was run with texture
compression and hardware shaders enabled and sound disabled.

Both processors churn out over 80
frames per second, with the FX-55 leading by close to 10%
at the lower resolution. Comanche 4 has continued to scale
with higher processor frequencies over the years (though,
as demonstrated by our recent articles on Prescott-based Intel
parts, this isn't always the case), so the 4800+'s slight
clock rate deficit to the FX's 2.6GHz resulted in the slightly
lower performance, though the gap narrowed somewhat between
the two CPUs at the higher resolutions.
Lock
On: Modern Air Combat was tested using the first three
minutes of the MiG-29 Intercept demo. The in-game graphics
were placed at a combination of settings, with detail, scenes,
and texture details at high, water at low, heat blr off, and
shadows at full to increase the CPU workload.

Something of an anomaly insofar as
flight simulations go, Lock On is strongly dependent upon
graphics processing for its performance and as such continues
to display little variance between the clock speeds of the
tested processors; the FX-55, however, did manage to nudge
ahead of the 4800+ by just a few frames at the lower resolutions,
though the frame rate difference would certainly be indiscernible
during actual game play. Whether or not the game's performance
will continue to scale with next-generation graphics boards
remains to be seen.
Go
To Page 3
Click
here to go to top of this page.
Copyright 2008, SimHQ.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact the webmaster.
|