|
Review: AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Back
to Page 1
Simulation / Game Benchmark Scores
As a watershed title for multi-processing
support, SimHQ enjoys making heavy use of Falcon
4: Allied Force for dual-core testing. The two mission
tests that are used in this article can be found here
and the simulation itself was patched with the 1.0.6 update.
Because of the rather aged nature of its graphics engine,
F4: AF was tested only at the resolution of 1024x768, with
the average frame rate of each test as recorded by FRAPS listed.
Test 1, titled Ground,
is a short MUD moving flight that leaves Mandumi, heads over
the FLOT, and attacks an enemy supply depot that has heavy
AAA and SAM protection. Performance is recorded during the
first six minutes of the mission with the scores shown representing
the average frame rate.
|
F4:AF - Ground |
|
6000+ |
84 |
|
5000+ |
73 |
|
E6700 |
88 |
AMD’s new CPU performs very closely with Intel’s Core 2 Duo in this test, while the 5000+ fell behind by roughly 15%.

Test 2, Air,
is also based on the Korea map. The mission starts with the
threat warning siren blaring as the flight comes under immediate
attack by Su-27s. The Air mission is shorter than the Ground
test, with the frame rate recorded for three minutes.
F4:AF - Air |
6000+ |
99 |
5000+ |
77 |
E6700 |
107 |
The Intel CPU pulls ahead just a nudge more in this test, producing a 8% higher score than the 6000+. The latter’s higher frequency (and, also, larger L2 cache), however, sees a substantial performance lead over the slower X2 5000+.

Go
To Page 3
Click
here to go to top of this page.
Copyright 2008, SimHQ.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact the webmaster. |