Some suggestions.
First of all, be a leader. Be all you can be.
BECOME the Flight Leader. Take charge!
That way you can tell your wingmen what to do. I find the wingmen are vastly improved in 1.2 and they fight well and stay in formation (usually; they don't always follow me when I climb but they are below me).
I tell them to attack (pound the A key) and they engage aggressively. I tell them to rejoin (R key) and they break off their engagements and fall in on me.
Quite good, I think.
Why would anyone want to be a follower rather than a leader? But, then, I'm a retired real life Army colonel so I guess I just naturally lead. Some naturally follow. Well. what would the military be without lots of privates?
Select the leader option and I think you'll see a huge difference in the AI.
There are only about four commands you can give them. It isn't like you actually have to go through an officer course.
The claims system is indeed bogus.
I, too, have had claims rejected when there were lots of witnesses.
And I've had claims accepted when there was no one there to see my kill (I learned a long time ago in massive multiplayer sims -- the late great Dawn if Aces, actually -- to stay out of the furball and engage the enemy planes on the edges. I'm often drifting away from the main fight and often high above those crop dusters fighting in the dirt).
What is annoying is there is no logic to the acceptance or rejection.
In real life, I believe fewer than one claim in four was accepted.
That's okay and the sim should simulate (duh) reality.
But why reject the ones in which there are plenty of witnesses? I've even spelled their names incorrectly (with that goofy font OFF uses for mission rosters, I often have to guess whether it's an o or an a) and they have been accepted.
If I forgot to write out the name of the wingman beforehand, I just write in RFC Airman and some of those have been accepted.
It appears to be totally random.
Sorry to disappoint Poor le Marriott (does your family own hotels?) and all the others who waste time writing colorful after action reports (AARs). I've never used anything but the stock replies provided by the form and I'm certain my results are no better than all those wannabe Hemingways out there. Best case: Seven missions, six claims and five kills. And all I used was the stock wording.
Here's the AAR submitted by Roy Brown claiming he had shot down MvR (borrowed shamelessly from another forum):
http://www.theaerodrome.com/aces/cita/brown3.phpNot exactly flowery or detailed, is it?
ttt