Falcon Flight Model Evolution Page 5

Back To Page 4

 

Now, energy tactics become more appropriate. Updating on the new aircraft handling and energy management requirements for SP4, based on this diagram, suggests that due to the F-16’s higher energy bleed rate and lower sustained speed, he should choose the one circle fight and early high aspect shots, scissors type maneuvers, followed by extensions if guns only, due to the higher top speed… then rinse and repeat. Let’s take a look at that in diagram form. Below you see the sustained turning performance of both aircraft shown in a way that illustrates their relative turn radius and turn rate, it shows the relative position of both aircraft during a turn lasting six seconds.

Turn Circle Comparison

You can see that while the turn radius of both aircraft is very similar, the MiG-29 has gained a significant angular advantage. In order to counter that, I mentioned previously that the F-16 driver should choose the one circle fight and early high aspect shots, and scissors type maneuvers, the diagram below shows how that should work.

 

F4 Turn Circle Comparison

Image by 20mmHere you see that even though the MiG-29’s sustained turn rate is superior, the F-16 gets the first shot in this situation. If you miss the shot, reverse again into a scissors, and try again, or if the situation (other enemy fighters approaching or low ammunition or fuel) dictates, take the shot and use the time required for the MiG to reverse, to execute a zero G extension, but only providing the MiG doesn’t have a missile still on the rails.

The real difficulty for the humble flight sim pilot is that the appropriate tactics have changed along with the flight model, so the big question is, now that we have the new High fidelity flight models how have they influenced the air combat? In the second part, we will look at the performance of the F-16 and consider the Dissimilar Air Combat implications for the F-16 versus MiG-29, F-16 versus Su-27 engagements. Lastly, as pointed out earlier, there is a small group of highly skilled and enthusiastic volunteers working constantly on the flight models and much of their work has been directed towards accurate modeling of the different F-16 blocks and variants including the different engine and airframe combinations, so in part two we can also take a look at the outcome of their efforts, as they strive to ensure that Falcon4 remains the most accurate simulation of modern air combat currently available.

 


Download a pdf of this article here (648 kb).

We want your Feedback. Please let us know what you thought of this article here.


 


Vintage Gables P.A. Amplifier G-947 picture

Vintage Gables P.A. Amplifier G-947

$175.00



Collins HF Amplifier-Coupler Type 548S-3 (718U-5) picture

Collins HF Amplifier-Coupler Type 548S-3 (718U-5)

$609.99



Baker Electronics M3070N Audio Amplifier 990-3070-015 picture

Baker Electronics M3070N Audio Amplifier 990-3070-015

$315.00



Lockheed Amplifier Switch, Stall Limiter JR3152-14 picture

Lockheed Amplifier Switch, Stall Limiter JR3152-14

$175.00



Tactair T-3 Autopilot Amplifier picture

Tactair T-3 Autopilot Amplifier

$90.00



FLUXGATE AMPLIFIER Bendix Aviation 16527-3-B (SAE SPEC AS399, CAA-TS0-C6b) 115V picture

FLUXGATE AMPLIFIER Bendix Aviation 16527-3-B (SAE SPEC AS399, CAA-TS0-C6b) 115V

$199.99



King Radio KMA-20 Marker Beacon Receiver and Isolation Amplifier 066-1024-03 picture

King Radio KMA-20 Marker Beacon Receiver and Isolation Amplifier 066-1024-03

$150.00



AIC-25  AUDIO FREQUENCY AMPLIFIER   USED CONDITION AM437/AIC25 picture

AIC-25 AUDIO FREQUENCY AMPLIFIER USED CONDITION AM437/AIC25

$250.00



OECO Audio Amplifiers P/N 20119 picture

OECO Audio Amplifiers P/N 20119

$55.00



United Technologies Norden Systems Sikorsky droop comp amplifier 2138-50000-106 picture

United Technologies Norden Systems Sikorsky droop comp amplifier 2138-50000-106

$75.00



Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes