|
Book Reviews
January 12, 2006
Sergeant "Fancy
Jack" Crossman Series
by Garry Douglas Kilworth
Reviews
by Alex
"Zander" Keep
The Devil's
Own
The first of the Crossman series of
books this reads somewhere between John Keegan's The Face
Of Battle, Bravo Two Zero and James Bond.
The book details the adventures of
Sergeant Jack Crossman. A man of noble birth who has signed
on as an NCO in the army after running away from home and
has been sent to Crimea. Once there, Crossman is singled out
to lead a group of unkept ragamuffins on a series of exceptionally
dangerous missions and the book details these.
The
narrative proceeds apace, though similarities with the Sharpe
series of books seeming obvious, especially as the levels
of accuracy and research done by the respective authors seems
similar. Crossman's character and that of his soldiers reflect
the changing social structures of the time with the working
class acquiring their first sniff of power through the industrial
revolution though the horrors of the First World War and the
mistakes which caused them are clearly visible in the descriptions
of the changing face of the battles.
Although it can becomes difficult
to identify with the main character at times, this becomes
easier as the book progresses, particularly as his fallibility
becomes apparent. The author's experiences in the RAF clearly
come to the fore when describing attitudes and banter which
would not be out of place in today's armed forces and this
is particularly so when Crossman drops the pretense of being
a traditional NCO and instead deals with his men as humans.
The locations are widespread and beautifully described whether
it be the rain of the landing grounds or the alien nature
of the port at Sebastapol. Forgotten historical quirks of
the campaign (such as the orchard farmers and the spectators
at the battle) are brought in to add historical interest (though
Crossman's love of inventions is at times a little clumsy
in its execution by placing the action within a historical
context).
Crossman's sense of honor seems at
odds with how war was increasingly going to be fought while
the horrors of war are not spared in this book. In particular,
the author makes special mention of the incessant cholera
which decimated the army.
Other characters in the book are dealt
with only briefly. Life is hard and as a consequence the author
portrays the troops in his company as those who have endured
rather than enjoyed life and this in turn has led to their
characterization being only peripheral in nature. The remainder
receive scant more attention. Officers are generally seen
as boorish and out of touch while women are seen to be tucked
up in the bonds of society in which they lived.
In summary I would recommend
anyone, whether they have an interest in the Crimean War or
not, to read this book. The story is a rip roaring adventure
and the author is to be commended for his attention to detail
and exciting prose. I would make only one request for future
novels by the author could we please have a public
school other than Harrow or Eton mentioned?!

The Valley Of Death
Although The Valley Of Death
picks up from where The Devil's Own finished, it is
a very different book from the first one. Crossman has now
been identified as a skilled assassin and spy and his particular
talents are much in demand by the British Army as the conflict
turns into a bloody stalemate. With the Russian army seemingly
after him personally, a character from Crossman's past arrives
to further complicate his situation
.
The author's added experience in characterization
shows from the outset. Crossman himself is far from the James
Bond figure of the first book. Crossman is fallible and, although
he usually gets the job done, there is not the same unflappable
certainty that characterized the first book. Crossman's experiences
are not the apparent breeze of the first book with the emotional
scars of the character increasingly matched by his physical
scars.
Unlike
the first book, the other characters get more of a mention.
The author's descriptions of "Skuggs" and "Devlin"
invite the reader into the world of the common soldier, providing
fully-fleshed, three dimensional characters that have you
thinking about them long after you put the book down. "Wynter"
deserves a special mention as a brilliant piece of writing.
His character arises from that of typical cannon fodder to
that of a hard done, but intelligent human being who has found
it easier to get by on the wrong side of the tracks. Similarly
the new member of the platoon, "Clancy" is brought
forward brilliantly with the absurdity of his being in the
army corresponding with the absurdity of the army's predicament
in Crimea.
The tactics and leadership of the
army comes under the same withering fire as in the first book.
It is notable that the leadership is not shown as being quite
so corrupted by the restrictions of their class as in The
Devil's Own. Whether this is because of the passage of
time in the conflict, or whether this is a conscious decision
on the part of the author is unknown, but this makes a welcome
change. It allows the leaders to be seen as short-sighted
and stupid rather than cold blooded and illogical.
The descriptions of the various battles
are as good as The Devil's Own (particularly that of
the Charge of the Light Brigade). Many interesting asides
are thrown in. Small facts such as the charge of the Light
Brigade mostly taking place at a trot, and coming as a surprise.
Once again, the action changes locations with breathtaking
frequency and each place is painted with the same attention
to detail that allows it to be solidified in the mind's eye
of the reader.
There are criticisms of the book,
however. Peterson seems an extraneous character for much of
the book and some characters such as the shepherd seem to
figure purely as a way of drawing the story on. Once again
Crossman and "Jarrard" have an almost Nostradamus-like
ability to predict the future while the character of "Mrs.
Durham" seems incomprehensible she appears to
take joy from war and yet hate its produce!
To waste time attempting to find flaws
in this book detracts from its overall ability to pull the
reader in. Instead I would merely commend this book to anyone
who enjoys a good story with intelligent dialogue and brilliant
writing.
We want your Feedback.
Please let us know what you thought of this article here.
Click
here to go to top of this page. Copyright 2008, SimHQ.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact the webmaster. |